bubble to view comments.
Loading Glossary… ebjuodisius@gmail.com May 2 2025 at 8:18AM on page 58
I think this idea of added street connections could be great. In implementation would be good to understand how necessary this is for success and understanding of priority moving forward
×
Warning message
The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.Connect the Junction Master Plan March Draft
Log in to Add Comments
Log In
Not registered?
ebjuodisius@gmail.com May 2 2025 at 8:16AM on page 60
Current access is available here. Would be good to improve! Would be ideal to add connection to Irioquois or Orchard terrace to allow this to be a ped (bike?) through connection
Elijah Massey May 1 2025 at 7:44PM on page 69
Suggestion
Please expand to include all proposed goals and related actions presented to align with roadmap and inform the activation of this work.
ebjuodisius@gmail.com May 1 2025 at 10:59AM on page 52
Looking forward to updated zoning recommendations throughout the districts!
ebjuodisius@gmail.com May 1 2025 at 10:58AM on page 51
Would be great to add more examples of taller buildings! Including ones being built in the 2020s/2010s min.
ebjuodisius@gmail.com May 1 2025 at 10:57AM on page 50
Will proposed recommendations for height in the zones be added here?
ebjuodisius@gmail.com May 1 2025 at 10:56AM on page 47
I personally think the building height setback not necessary, the comment I heard concerns in public meeting was about views from the ferris wheel, not along pearl street. Would rather see more related building heights in this zone and without the constraint on developers.
ebjuodisius@gmail.com May 1 2025 at 10:53AM on page 46
Would we still allow residential first floor uses? what about first floor parking? keeping LOW COST building styles for both residential and commercial is important (New Mcgillicudy's building is lovely aesthetically but with many vacant commercial space, all the small locally serving shops in older construction are great!
ebjuodisius@gmail.com May 1 2025 at 10:51AM on page 41
these diagrams are super usefule! Add how you would get from Main st to Lincoln street with closed slip lane - through railroad presumably
ebjuodisius@gmail.com May 1 2025 at 10:50AM on page 40
we discussed as a planning commission that this area might be better served by keeping turn lane to south street and losing parking, although if this area grows in development parking may be needed.
ebjuodisius@gmail.com May 1 2025 at 10:48AM on page 38
is this existing or proposed? In general sections are confusing - which are proposed vs. existing. Would be nice to have side by side comparison of existing vs. proposed to easily compare along with section of road highlighted in plan that it relates to
in reply to JJArango's comment
ebjuodisius@gmail.com May 1 2025 at 10:45AM on page 31
and bus stop accomodations?
in reply to JJArango's comment
JJArango Apr 16 2025 at 1:53PM on page 32
action item: traffic analysis to evaluate road diets
JJArango Apr 16 2025 at 1:52PM on page 32
show sidewalk widened and resurfaced as a shared use path
JJArango Apr 16 2025 at 1:50PM on page 32
remove dimensions on other sections to make them more illustrative
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 2:31PM on page 27
Mention recent updates: Changes to allow for year-round operations of food trucks and trailers through consecutive temporary use permit renewals. Restrictions on the use of portable gasoline or diesel electric
generators were included [Section 703.J] CA, CE
generators were included [Section 703.J] CA, CE
Sarah Apr 11 2025 at 2:13PM on page 50
Numbering
Sarah Apr 11 2025 at 2:13PM on page 50
Bold or italicize
Sarah Apr 11 2025 at 2:07PM on page 45
Remove strategy numbers - I think they're confusing
Sarah Apr 11 2025 at 2:07PM on page 45
Renumber
in reply to JJArango's comment
Sarah Apr 11 2025 at 2:05PM on page 41
I think we're trying to argue that we don't close main street entirely in part so the bus can continue to use this route - is that accurate?
Sarah Apr 11 2025 at 2:02PM on page 39
Maybe it would be helpful to include the turning movement diagram on this page to resolve this question
Sarah Apr 11 2025 at 2:01PM on page 37
Renumber
Sarah Apr 11 2025 at 1:58PM on page 26
Renumber these
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:52PM on page 10
Add "problem statement" pages
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:50PM on page 51
this is a great example!
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:50PM on page 50
Ensure wastewater capacity in the collection system and at the WWTF.
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:49PM on page 48
if off-street parking minimums are reduced, on-street parking may become more important. Currently, overnight on-street parking is prohibited throughout the winter regardless of weather.
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:49PM on page 48
Comment by MG: Perhaps this would be a good opportunity to list specific desired outcomes near/at CVE, such as pedestrian-level amenities, housing, etc
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:49PM on page 48
Comment by MG: Perhaps this would be a good opportunity to list specific desired outcomes near/at CVE, such as pedestrian-level amenities, housing, etc
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:43PM on page 45
Ensure wastewater capacity in the collection system and at the WWTF.
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:43PM on page 45
Include stormwater requirements in conceptual planning. Consider large scale municipal stormwater improvement project off-site to accommodate redevelopment projects.
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:43PM on page 37
Ensure wastewater capacity existing in the collection system and at the WWTF.
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:42PM on page 37
Stormwater improvements will likely be required and should be considered as part of initial conceptual planning.
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:41PM on page 37
Significant redevelopment of roadway space(s) will likely trigger stormwater permitting requirements.
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:40PM on page 37
Any road diet considerations should involve capacity analysis for all modes of transportation.
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:40PM on page 35
As per March 25 meeting, this is not within the scope of the CRISI grant and will not be possible within the same project. The station design will be largely based on the 2016 scoping study. PP3.5 should probably be removed entirely. Future improvements can be discussed in PP3.1
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:37PM on page 34
bus routes need one way arrows
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:37PM on page 33
This has to be separate from the Amtrak Station project. Perhaps phased in starting with tents before establishing permanent structures.. Not sure who would fund or manage this.
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:35PM on page 32
Only label as "future development' where the location is up for redevelopment.
in reply to JJArango's comment
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:34PM on page 32
What if we added a small plaza with bike racks on Pearl, encouraging riders to dismount their bikes and enter a newly walkable Five Corners
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:34PM on page 32
As per meeting on March 25, PP2.4 should be removed or re-designed. Staff do not see a reasonable alternative to a three-lane cross section to without causing unacceptable impacts to intersection capacity and delay. The five corners is not a typical intersection- even if simplified by implementing CC.5-7, signal cycles are still long and queuing capacity is needed. Any lane reduction here withou a feature to mitigate the loss in capacity will likely be rejected by the City Engineer.
If multi-modal improvements are recommended, please focus on re-designating sidewalk space or expanding the ROW into the 2 Lincoln property and fire station where possible.
If multi-modal improvements are recommended, please focus on re-designating sidewalk space or expanding the ROW into the 2 Lincoln property and fire station where possible.
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:33PM on page 31
Will there will be turn pockets at some locations?
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:33PM on page 30
consideration could be given to install green stormwater infrastructure rather than keep it a catch basin system on pearl. This would help achieve the addition of green space but also help meet SW reduction targets
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:32PM on page 30
PP2.2 needs to be presented in a way that avoids comflicting with the scoping study update Stantec will be doing in the upcoming months. We do not know what the cross section for the final study will look like yet. I think it would be confusing to include a "proposed section" in this report.
Note that the Stantec is being asked to come up with a design that avoids placing trees above and below the utilities. They are also being asked to consider a design that reduces duplication such as having both a shared-use path and on-street bike lanes.
Note that the Stantec is being asked to come up with a design that avoids placing trees above and below the utilities. They are also being asked to consider a design that reduces duplication such as having both a shared-use path and on-street bike lanes.
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:31PM on page 29
seasonal?
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:31PM on page 29
This is only necessary if PP2.2 will take many years to implement. We will have a better idea of how long PP2.2 will take to implement when we finish the Scoping Study Update.
JJArango Apr 11 2025 at 1:31PM on page 27
Consider linking this with the timing and implementation of the Downtown Organization
View all
Comments
Close