×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Milton Comprehensive Plan Feedback: City Council July '24

Please respond to the prompts in the PDF below to help us refine the Comprehensive Plan that will help determine what Milton becomes over the next 20 years.

We are in the process of rolling out a full draft of the 2044 Comprehensive Plan Update. During this rollout, we are hoping to solicit community feedback to ensure that we can efficiently address community desires. The plan is divided into two sections - the first, Volume I, is a succinct document covering some background for each plan element, the planning process and containing all of the goals and policies for each element. The second, Volume II, includes a longer discussion and the background research and analysis that informs the Plan. The PDFs below are the plan documents recommended by the Planning Commission in June with suggested changes highlighted in orange. Volume II Transportation and Capital Facilities elements have not been formally recommended by Planning Commission, but are included with disclaimer.

The map below is a reference map which includes many of the layers that we are using to determine future land use decisions. Map layers include a draft of the Future Land Use Map updated 6/12/2024, wetland impacted areas, tribal boundaries, existing zoning, vacant and redevelopable land, existing land uses and proposed subareas for future focused planning efforts. Turn on and off layers in the lower right corner and view the map legend in the upper right.

 

Please leave comments and respond to the prompts in the two documents (Draft of Volume I and Volume II) below. Thank you for your feedback!

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio
View all

Comments

Close

Suggestion
Potentially another sub-header related to EV charging stations and solar panel installation? Perhaps a goal for the City to offset its own energy costs by adding panels on its rooms?
Suggestion
Additional sub-header suggestion: Assess on a periodic basis whether City residents benefit from City-run utilities or if contracting with other providers would improve services.
Fundamental Actions
I support strengthening this language to impose more barriers on the city using general obligation bonds.
Question
I recognize this is the public feedback list, but could we at least lower the placement of Surprise Lake access?
Suggestion
A better statement would be "should monitor opportunities to acquire land adjacent to Surprise Lake if feasible for public waterfront access." I don't like mandating the city take action around the lake.
Suggestion
I do not support High priority for this.
Fundamental Actions
Safe routes to schools should receive its own sub-header under TR 22.
Suggestion
Would like to see the addition of a sub-header to the effect of "Explore opportunities for the City to create traffic filters on non-arterials to discourage non-local traffic from utilizing neighborhood roads while providing opportunities for safe walking and biking routes."
Strong agreement with 17-4-17.6.
Question
What is current LOS?
Question
Should we acknowledge the light rail station in Fife anywhere? Seems like a critical connection that this alludes to.
Fundamental Actions
Need something about safe and secure bike parking at commercial locations. Either needs to be entered into code or at least encouraged.
Question
This is a good goal. Just wondering if this is a statutory requirement?
Question
Isn't this the same as 2.4(d) above?
Quick Win Actions
contribute TO the
Question
This looks similar to a form-based code idea. Is that a potential step to take in the sub-areas?
in reply to Angelie's comment
Fundamental Actions
Absolutely agree. Particularly with Milton's significant tribal land, this is great step.
Suggestion
I'd prefer "Aggressively" instead of strategically.
Fundamental Actions
Need a sub-header specific to encouraging safe non-motorized access to schools. The impact of hundreds of idling cars twice a day for school pickup/drop off cannot be ignored.
Question
What benefit does this give the district?
Fundamental Actions
This "pursue strategies" line should be its own LU 2 sub-header. This would be a great place to list city actions to improve the space, such as building a plaza, acquiring civic space, or adding public art.
Suggestion
Could we incorporate into the Town Center idea the goal of a plaza or non-retail gathering space? Might be too ambitious to bring into the graphics, but perhaps in the goals and policies.
Quick Win Actions
Should be a period or semicolon
Excellent addition to the broad vision. The "unfortunate" status is a necessary recognition.
Suggestion
Given the soon-coming addition of 167, I think that should be added into this section.
Quick Win Actions
This is the only appearance of "upstream" that I saw. Maybe replacing with a less wonky word, like "broader" or "regional".
Quick Win Actions
Great sentence and vision.
in reply to Angelie's comment
I thought there was only one defined Neighborhood Center, in which case I like the capitals. But if it's a generic term, no capitals. Is the goal of neighborhood centers to create sub-areas?
Question
"Complete" is used many times but never defined with numbers. Does it require walkable access to a grocery store? Sidewalks? Housing variety?
Question
Should this just state Parks? Or is it referring to preserving open spaces on private land? A bit unclear to me.
Suggestion
For discussion. Is "rural character" defined by the presence of open spaces and low density? Or is it something else? Historically, rural character was used as a reason to not require sidewalks or to prioritize funding, as well as a basis to keep single family zoning. I think this paragraph does a great job with hitting a lot of Milton's best qualities with key phrases, such as "heart of a small town," "socially connected," "belonging," and even the rural/urban mix. But I think we should only use those words (rural and urban) if we mean them, and we need to have a definition or a common understanding because they are both heavily loaded terms.
Question
Why start at 7?
Question
Unclear to me the differences between the takeaways here and the themes on the next page.
reference number?
"Comprehensive Plan" means....

also 18.12.020?
Not us :)
countywide - one word
Don't think 'electrical provider' should be capitalized in 6.1 and 7.2
is this missing what LOS standard we are adopting?
period missing
period missing
Question
Should ti be Water LOS:
period missing
period missing
wrong color. Should be the aqua blue
Not consist with bullets
Is there a reason this is shall and others are should?
Suggestion
duplicate word
Suggestion
should
Suggestion
see previous comment on page 112